The Concept of polytheism in the Religious Studies as a Result of lingual misunderstanding
In 1921 was published the book of the famous Austrian-British philosopher and funder of the analytic philosophy Ludwig Johann Wittgenstein, in which he wrote, that the big part of our philosophical problems, which were subject of the thinking of the thousands philosophers, are created not by the difficulty of reality but by the complication of the language. When a philosopher analyzes a language he uses, he will find that the biggest part of the philosophical problems is illusory. Following Wittgenstein's advices, in this article we probe to analyze what means the concept "polytheism" and to answer the questions: did the phenomenon, what is with this word described, anytime exist, or it is only a phantasies' fabrication, and all attempts to think about it are wandering in the dark labyrinths without exit. The first problem we have in our way is absolutely darkness in this question. We could not find any research, in which the concept of polytheism is analyzed in this way we changed. So we must get through the forest of an unknown ourselves without opportunity to have support from the experience of the predecessors. We hope our mistakes might be useful for the following researches. The Greek word "doxa polytheos" was first time used by Philo of Alexandria and after them many Judaic and Christian authors repeated this word opposing own religion to the paganism. Jan Bodin 1n 16th Century used this word in the modern mean as a France word "polythéisme". The Greek word "doxa polytheos" and the France one "polythéisme", though they are constructed of the same Greek word "Θεός", based on the different concepts, because in 16 centuries the word "Θεός" changed its means. In Greek-speaking society this word was used to detonate any being who overstate the material world. When Thales of Millet wrote, that "the world is full of gods", he did not mean that there is an Absolut in every small part of the world. When he used the word "Θεός" in this mean, Thales thought about different objects, as we called "God" now. The mean of the term "polytheism" is unclear and is the cause of many researches problems in the religious studies. The Greek word "Θεός" detonated every sacral being, which was the object of the worship, but not the Absolut. When this word went in the term "polytheism", its mean was changed, and it was used for the calling Absolut in the Christian meaning. This transformation of the meaning created the wrong conception that in the world there were or are religions, the members of them believes in the existence of some or many Absolutes. The problem of using concept "polytheism" is not a real academic problem but an illusions problem, what is caused by the wrong and incorrect using of the term. The Greek word "Θεός", of them are created the terms "monotheism" and "polytheism", is used in both terms in different meanings. In the term "monotheism" the word "Θεός" means God-Absolut, and in the term "polytheism" – any beings, what are the objects of the religious worship. The monotheism and polytheism are not two different phase of the entvelopment of the religious consciousness. These ideas are created by the wrongness of Hegel's philosophy and must be uprooted from the lexicon of the religious studies.
Polinskaya I. A Local History of Greek Polytheism. Gods, Peaple, and the Land of Aigina, 800-400 BC. – Leiden, Boston: Brill, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004262089
Russell B. A history of western philosophy. – Simon and Schuster, 1972.
Schopenhauer A. Sämtliche Werke. Bd. 12. – Stuttgart, Berlin: Cotta'sche Buchhandlung Nachf., 1894.
Tomski G. Tangrism classique. / Concorde. – № 1. – 2014.
Uždavinys A. The Golden Chain: An Anthology of Pythagorean and Platonic Philosophy. – World Wisdom, 2004.
Wilhelm von Rubruk. Reisen zum Großkhan der Mongolen. Von Konstantinopel nach Karakorum 1253-1255. / Bearbeitet und herausgegeben von H.D. Leicht. – Stuttgart: Erdmann, 1984.
Wittgenstein L. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicum. With an introduction an Bertran Russel. – London, New York: Routledge, 1974.
Antologia mirovoj filisofii. V. 1, P. 1. – Moscow: Mysl, 1964.
Balukh V. Monoteizm u systemi relihijnykh viruvan. – Religion and Society. Nr 4 (20). – Chernivci: ChNU, 2015.
Lobovyk B. Problemy periodyzacii istorii religii. // Ukrainian Religious Studies. Nr. 5. – Kyiv: UAR, 1997.
Brusnjanin А. Traktovka ponjatia "blago" v rabotakh Platona. // Summa of Philosophy. Nr. 7. – Ekaterengurg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 2007.
Humboldt W. Izbrannyje Trudy po jazykovedeniju. – Moscow: Progress, 1984.
Zhanajdarov О. Mify drevneho Kazakhstana. – Almaty: Aruna, 2006.
Mozhovyj І. "Monoteistychna" tendentsia v pisnjoantychnomu jazychnytstvi. // Ukrainian Religious Studies. Nr. 4. – Kyiv: UAR, 1996.
Shaff F. Istorija christianskoj Tserkvi. V.5: Srednevekovoje christianstvo 1049-1294 g. po R.Ch. / Per.: О. Rybakov. – Sankt-Peterburg: Biblia dlja vsekh, 2008.
Shepetiak О. Lohika. Pidruchnyk dlja studentiv vyschykh navchalnych zakladiv. – Kyiv: Feniks, 2015.
Shepetiak O. Monoteistychni tendencii v jehypetskij religii dodynastijnoho i rannjoho dynastijnoho periodiv. // Ukrainian Religious Studies. Nr. 80. – Kyiv: UAR, 2016.
Copyright (c) 2019 Олег Михайлович Шепетяк
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.