Freedom for me and, perhaps, you – but surely not them? Attitudes to new religions in contemporary democracies

Authors

  • Eileen Barker London School of Economics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32420/rs.2020.25.2169

Keywords:

religion, new religious movements, religious freedom

Abstract

Throughout history, new religious movements (NRMs) have been treated with suspicion and fear. Although contemporary democracies do not throw members of NRMs to the lions or burn them at the stake, they have ways and means of making it clear that pluralism and freedom of religion have their limits. The limits to pluralism are evident enough in countries such as Saudi Arabia or North Korea that have regimes stipulating that citizens must adhere exclusively to their one and only True religion or ideology. Limitations to pluralism have also been manifest in countries such as Northern Nigeria, Sri Lanka or Myanmar (Burma), where terrorists have used violence to eliminate religions other than their own. Even otherwise peaceful democracies – that have signed the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the European Convention on Human Rights, and other statements affirming freedom of belief (and non-belief) for all – can discriminate against religions, especially the new religious movements in their midst, and this they do in a variety of ways [Richardson 1994; Lindholm 2004;

Kirkham 2013]. This paper outlines, from the perspective of a sociologist of religion, some of the ways in which such attitudes toward, and treatment of, NRMs can demonstrate more subtle, but nevertheless marked and serious limitations to freedom, even in societies that pride themselves on their progressive and inclusive approach to diversity.

References

Barker, Eileen (2015). Do What Thou Wilt shall be the Whole of the Law. In: Freedom of Conscience and Religious Freedom, Michaela Moravčíková (ed.). Bratislava: Institute for State-Church Relations.

Barker, Eileen (2008). The Centrality of Religion in Social Life: Essays in Honour of James A. Beckford. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Barker, Eileen (2002). Watching for Violence: A Comparative Analysis of Five Cult-Watching Groups. In: Cults, Religion and Violence, David G. Bromley and J. Gordon Melton (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Barker, Eileen (1997). But Who's Going to Win? National and Minority Religions in Post-Communist Society. In: New Religious Phenomena in Central and Eastern Europe, Irena Borowik and Grzegorz Babinski (eds.). Kraków: Nomos, 25-62.

Barker, Eileen (1994). But is it a Genuine Religion? In: Between Sacred and Secular: Research and Theory on Quasi Religion, Arthur L. Greil and Thomas Robbins (eds.), Greenwich CT; London: JAI Press, 97-109.

Barker, Eileen (1989). New Religious Movements: A Practical Introduction. London: HMSO.

Beckford, James A. (1999). The Mass Media and New Religious Movements. In: New Religious Movements: Challenge and Response, Bryan R. Wilson and Jamie Cresswell (ed.). London: Routledge, 103-19.

Charity Commission. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/charity-commission

Chiţimia, Silvia (1995). The New Religious Landscape in Romania. In: New Religions and the New Europe, Robert Towler (ed.). Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, 87-98.

European Court of Human Rights. European Convention on Human Rights. Amended. Available at: http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf

Fautré, Willy (2012). Japan: Abduction & Deprivation of Freedom for the Purpose of Religious De-conversion. Brussels: Human Rights Without Frontiers International.

Filatov, Sergei (1999). Sects and New Religious Movements in Post-Soviet Russia. In: Proselytism and Orthodoxy in Russia: The New War for Souls, John Witte Jr. and Michael Bourdeaux (eds.), Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 163-84.

Guyard, Jacques and Alain Gest (1995). Les Sectes en France. Paris: Assemblée Nationale. Available at: http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/rap-enq/r2468.asp

Introvigne, Massimo (2020). If Your Religion is a Xie Jiao, You Go to Jail – But What Is A Xie Jiao? Bitter Winter 11 June.

Joint Public Issues Team. “Westminster Faith Debate: Religion in Public Life”. (Accessed 21 February 2015). Available at: http://www.jointpublicissues.org.uk/westminster-faith-debate-religion-in-public-life/

Kirkham, David M. (2013). State Responses to Minority Religions. Aldershot Ashgate.

Kraleva, Milka (2001). The Master Peter Deunov. His Life and Teaching. Sofia: Kibea.

Lheureux, N.L. et al. (2000). Report on Discrimination Against Spiritual and Therapeutical Minorities in France. Paris: Coordination des Associations et Particuliers Pour la Liberté de Conscience.

Lindholm, Tore, Durham, W. Cole and Tahzib-Lie, Bahia G. (2004). Facilitating Freedom of Religion or Belief: A Deskbook. Leiden, The Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill.

Loi du 9 décembre 1905 concernant la séparation des Eglises et de l'Etat. Republic of France. Available at:

http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000000508749&fastPos=1&fastReqId=1194187241&categorieLien=cid&oldAction=rechTexte

Mission interministérielle de vigilance et de lutte contre les dérives sectaires. Available at: http://www.derives-sectes.gouv.fr/

Palmer, Susan (2011). The New Heretics of France: Minority Religions, la République, and the Government-Sponsored “War on Sects". New York: Oxford University Press.

Patrick, Ted with Dulack, Tom (1976). Let Our Children Go. New York: Ballantine.

Richardson, James T. and Introvigne, Massimo (2007). New Religious Movements, Counter-movements, Moral Panics, and the Media. In: Teaching New Religions, David G. Bromley (ed.). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 91-114.

Richardson, James T. (1994). Regulating Religion: Case Studies from Around the Globe. New York & Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

Shterin, Marat (2012). New Religious Movements in Changing Russia". In: The Cambridge Companion to New Religious Movements, Olav Hammer and Mikael Rothstein (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 286-302.

Shupe, Anson D. and Bromley, David G. (1994). Anti-Cult Movements in Cross-Cultural Perspective. New York: Garland.

Shupe, Anson D. and Bromley, David G. (1980). The New Vigilantes: Deprogrammers, Anti-Cultists, and the New Religions. Beverly Hills: Sage.

Supreme Court of the Northern Territory of Australia. Ostreicher v Secretary of State for Environment (1978). 1 WLR 810 64.

Eck, Duymaer, Twist, Amanda (2015). Perfect Children: Growing Up on the Religious Fringe. New York: Oxford University Press.

Yang, Fenggang (2006). The Red, Black, and Gray Markets of Religion in China. The Sociological Quarter, 47:93-122.

Zhu, Guobin (2010). Prosecuting “Evil Cults”: A Critical Examination of Law Regarding Freedom of Religious Belief in Mainland China. Human Rights Quarterly, 32(3): 471-501.

Westminster Faith Debate: Religion in Public Life. Available at:

http://www.jointpublicissues.org.uk/westminster-faith-debate-religion-in-public-life/

Downloads

Published

2020-12-08

Issue

Section

Reflections, Informations, Reviews