The genesis of the idea of freedom of religious conscience in the Middle Ages

Authors

  • Mykhailo Babii UARR

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32420/rs.2020.25.2165

Keywords:

сaesaropapism, papacesarism, freedom of religion, freedom of the church, pope, emperor

Abstract

Abstract. The article is devoted to the idea of freedom of conscience, the processes of developing its understanding in the Middle Ages, the opposition of various approaches, which are represented by thinkers of the Western and Eastern Christian tradition. These traditions were formed and developed within the framework of interpretive assessments of the relationship between the state and the church, known as Caesaropapism and Papоcaesarism. The peculiarities of Western Christian and Eastern Christian approaches to issues of freedom of conscience, which were formed by the nature of state power and its relations with the church, are analyzed. The Catholic understanding of relations was based on the independence of the church from the state, on its freedom, on the opposition of the spiritual and the earthly, on the supremacy of the former over the latter. It is claimed that the Roman Catholic Church has always claimed complete control over the secular state. According to the Orthodox view, the "spiritual and secular" should be integrated into one "symphonic" system with the leading role of the state. The church "gave its freedom" to the Caesars.

The mechanism of the emergence of religious alternatives to the official teachings of the church, in particular heresies, sectarianism, schism, which served as a breeding ground for the emergence of religious freedom, freedom in the church. The role of the rationalist and anti-church component, philosophical and theological concepts, which were determined by a significant increase in scientific knowledge and the development of philosophical teachings, which also led to ideas of freedom of conscience, is emphasized. During this period, the genesis of the idea of freedom of conscience was played by the substantiation of the idea of human rights, in particular, the right to freedom of conscience and religion.

The Middle Ages are presented as a specific era, which is associated with previous periods in the intellectual - philosophical and theological - understanding of freedom of conscience, in which despite all the negative socio-political, religious processes, persecution of freethinkers, formed principles of freedom of conscience and theoretical justification future paradigm. During this period, it was mainly about freedom of religious conscience, about the freedom of the church, about conscience, freedom of will, and not about freedom of conscience. It was important to substantiate the idea of the right of the autonomous mind, the doctrine of "natural light", the distinction between the concepts of "sacred" and "secular". At the same time, freedom of religious conscience can be said only for Christian believers, all others - infidels, "schismatics", heretics - were outlawed, society considered them as enemies of the state and the church.

Heretical movements, which originated in the bosom of the Christian church and were determined by the context and events of the Middle Ages, became the environment where the ideas of freedom of conscience, including freedom of religious conscience, religious tolerance received "energy" for their development and manifestation as a public demand.

References

Abelard, P. (1959). The story of my disasters. M.: Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences.

Andreieva, L. (2001). Christianity and power in Russia and the West: a comparative analysis. Social sciences and modernity. 2001. №4, 85-102.

Benjamin (Novik). Christian understanding of human rights. Religious studies. 2004. №4.

Berdiaev, N.A. (1994). Philosophy of the free spirit. M.: Republic.

Blei, Karel (2002). Freedom of Religion and Belief: Europe’s Story. Assen: Royal van Gorgum.

Donini, A. At the origins of Christianity (from birth to Justinian) (1979). M.: Politizdat.

Florovsky, G. (1998). Empire and desert. In Spirit and letter. Ed. Florovsky, G. Kyiv: Sphere, #3-4, 230-261.

Gergey, E. (1996). History of the papacy. M.: Republic.

Hegel, G. W. F. (1996). Philosophy of religion: In 2 vols. M.: Thought. Vol.1.

Herold, W. (1991). Philosophy and theology in the European cultural and educational environment of the fifteenth century. In New Ideas in Philosophy. Yearbook. M.: Science.

Kozlowski, P. (1998). Society and the state. The inevitable dualism. M.: Republic.

Kudriavtsev, V.V. (1997). Lectures on the history of religion and free thought. Minsk: TetraSystems LLC.

Maassen, F. (1882). Nine chapters on the free church and freedom of conscience. Yaroslavl.

Marynovych, M. The Ukrainian Idea and Christianity or When the Colored Horses of the Apocalypse Ride (2003). Kyiv: Spirit and Letter.

Morgan, D. (1989). The Philosophy of John Scottus Eriugena: A Study of Idealism in the Middle Ages. Cambridge University Press.

Pavlenko, Yu. V. (2002). History of world civilization. Philosophical analysis. Kiev: Phoenix.

Real, J., Antiseri, D. (1994).Western philosophy from its origins to the present day. Vol.2: The Middle Ages. SPb: LLP TC "Petropolis".

Rodnikova, N. (1897). The teachings of Blessed Augustine on the relationship between the state and the church. Kazan: Typogr. Imperial University.

Sagan, O.N. (2004). Universal Orthodoxy: essence, history, current state. Kyiv: The world of knowledge.

Tierney, B. (1996). Religious Rights: A Historical Perspective. In Religious Liberty in Western Thought. Ed. by. N.B. Reynolds, W.C. Durham. Atlanta: Sсholars Press.

Yakovenko,I.G. (2005). Big and small traditions of European culture: to the problem statement. Article I. Social sciences and modernity. № 4, 86-99.

Published

2020-12-08

Issue

Section

Articles